<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nicholas Kaufmann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com</link>
	<description>The Official Website of Author Nicholas Kaufmann</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who: &#8220;The Name of the Doctor&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/20/doctor-who-the-name-of-the-doctor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/20/doctor-who-the-name-of-the-doctor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After a very disjointed and lackluster season, <strong>Doctor Who</strong> sprints to the finish line with a superb example of what the show can do now that it&#8217;s been freed from the narrative shackles of the Amy-Rory-River arc: the Season 7 climax &#8221;The &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a very disjointed and lackluster season, <strong>Doctor Who</strong> sprints to the finish line with a superb example of what the show can do now that it&#8217;s been freed from the narrative shackles of the Amy-Rory-River arc: the Season 7 climax &#8221;The Name of the Doctor.&#8221; Let&#8217;s dive in, shall we?</p>
<p><strong>MAJOR SPOILERS FOLLOW! BE WARNED!</strong></p>
<p>I think what I liked especially about this episode is that it had stakes. For the past two seasons, there haven&#8217;t been any real stakes involved to the season enders. In Season 5, a crack in time and space is going to destroy the entire universe, but that&#8217;s okay because the Doctor can just reboot the universe. In Season 6, the Doctor has to die or all of time and space will get messed up, but that&#8217;s okay because the Doctor can fake his death with a robot and apparently that will satisfy all the cosmic demands of his death. In &#8220;The Name of the Doctor,&#8221; at least, characters wind up using their smarts and their abilities to defeat the bad guys and save the Doctor&#8217;s life. There&#8217;s no &#8220;trick&#8221; here, no sneaky way out. There are stakes, and those stakes are real, and they are overcome through the actions of the characters. More of that, please.</p>
<p>It was an interesting choice to make the Great Intelligence this season&#8217;s big bad. The Great Intelligence is hardly one of the more popular monsters of the classic series, having appeared only twice, both times during Patrick Troughton&#8217;s run as the Second Doctor, and not having an iconic physical appearance to draw upon. There are some drawbacks to this choice, too. The Great Intelligence only appeared this season in the Christmas special &#8220;The Snowmen&#8221; and in &#8220;The Bells of St. John.&#8221; In both episodes, the Great Intelligence is defeated by the Doctor, but it hardly seems like enough to drive this disembodied entity to launch the vengeful plan that brings everyone to far-future Trenzalore. Granted, the Doctor did defeat the Great Intelligence two more times, but they weren&#8217;t in this season. Those episodes &#8212; &#8220;The Abominable Snowmen&#8221; and &#8220;The Web of Fear&#8221; &#8212; were aired more than 40 years ago. So yes, an interesting choice, and maybe not an altogether successful one, but it&#8217;s definitely another example of Steven Moffat&#8217;s fascination with presenting story arcs out of order. (I get that time travel is involved, but I&#8217;d argue there&#8217;s a reason recurring characters were always met in order in classic <strong>Who</strong>. For example, whenever the Doctor crossed paths with the Master, it was always after their last televised encounter. Same with Davros, the Cybermen, etc. It&#8217;s just easier to keep track of everything that way.)</p>
<p>What&#8217;s also interesting is that even though this is Trenzalore, the events that take place don&#8217;t seem to jibe with Dorium&#8217;s warning about the planet.  He said: &#8220;On the fields of Trenzalore, at the fall of the eleventh, when no living creature can speak falsely or fail to answer, a question will be asked, a question that must never, ever be answered. The First Question, the oldest question in the Universe, that must never be answered, hidden in plain sight: Doctor who?&#8221; While the Doctor&#8217;s name is a plot point in this episode, it is neither revealed upon the Great Intelligence&#8217;s asking, nor is there anything about not being able to speak falsely. Online, some have posited that this <i>is</i> what Dorium warned him about, that the &#8220;fall of the eleventh&#8221; happens when the Doctor cuts the antigrav so the TARDIS will fall to the planet&#8217;s surface, and that &#8220;silence falls&#8221; when the stars start to go out, but I think that&#8217;s stretching it. The events Dorium warns about are supposed to bring about the fall of the Silence, that secret society revealed in Season 6, and the Silence has nothing to do with this story. But we do learn that a big battle took place on Trenzalore in which the Doctor died, so it&#8217;s possible the battle that&#8217;s referenced is the one Dorium warns about. This would make it yet another example of Moffat presenting plot points out of order.</p>
<p>Much to my surprise, considering how overcomplicated and riddled with plot holes Steven Moffat&#8217;s grand schemes usually are, the explanation for the multiple Claras works. There&#8217;s a lot of science fiction handwaving about <em>how</em> it works &#8212; can a timeline actually be a physical doorway? &#8212; but it works on a storytelling level. What&#8217;s more, it gives us a wonderful, brilliantly nostalgic opportunity to see all the classic Doctors we won&#8217;t be seeing in the 50th anniversary special. Well played, Steven Moffat! (That said, some of the CGI was awful. Patrick Troughton might have been the worst, running in his fur coat across a green screen beach at a completely different speed from everyone else.) Most interesting, though, was Clara&#8217;s interaction with the First Doctor and Susan. The implication here is that one of the Claras is Gallifreyan, which opens <em>such</em> a can of worms! I mean, did she continue on, regenerating when needed, and eventually die in the Time War? Is Chancellor Flavia&#8217;s last name perhaps Oswald? (I kid!) Clara telling the First Doctor which TARDIS to steal was pretty awesome, but it seems to nullify the idea that the TARDIS chose the Doctor as much as he chose it, which would be a sad loss to the mythology.</p>
<p>This episode also nicely wraps up the River Song storyline, should they decide to end it. This is, after all, the post-<em>Library</em> River, and she and the Doctor get a wonderful, no-holds-barred goodbye scene. That said, I suspect River has at least one story left in her, which would be Dorium&#8217;s Trenzalore prediction, most likely the moment when she learns the Doctor&#8217;s real name.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s John Hurt. Aside from the Doctor explaining that John Hurt is him but not the Doctor and then having the onscreen titles introduce him as &#8220;the Doctor&#8221; in direct contradiction to what the Doctor <em>just said</em>, his presence in that strange, hard-even-for-the-script-to-explain cavern that is also the Doctor&#8217;s timeline is absolutely thrilling. Even with only two lines of dialogue and a single action (turning around), Hurt shows what an incredible actor he is. His presence in the 50th anniversary special has been confirmed, and I can&#8217;t wait to see what they do with him.</p>
<p>The Internet is abuzz with rumors about who he is. Most prevalent is the idea that he&#8217;s a &#8220;forgotten&#8221; or &#8220;repressed&#8221; incarnation, the one who actually pulled the trigger that ended the Time War. Which would make Eccleston really the Tenth Doctor, Tennant the Eleventh, and Smith the Twelfth. This seems rather overcomplicated and I&#8217;m not sure what the point of it would be &#8212; which means it&#8217;s right up Steven Moffat&#8217;s alley and so it&#8217;s probably true!</p>
<p>By the way, how cool would it be if they went back to the scene in &#8220;The God Complex&#8221; where the Doctor opens the door to the room of his greatest fear and we see now that it&#8217;s John Hurt?</p>
<p>&#8220;The Name of the Doctor&#8221; doesn&#8217;t wrap up everything, though. For instance, we still don&#8217;t know why the TARDIS doesn&#8217;t like Clara. We also don&#8217;t know why the Doctor is removing himself from databases across the universe, or what he hopes to achieve with that. Season 8 has been given the green light, so hopefully we&#8217;ll find out then. Or maybe in the 50th anniversary special.</p>
<p>And now for some <strong>Doctor Who</strong> neepery! I cannot <em>believe</em> the Great Intelligence name-checked the Valeyard! Fans of classic <strong>Who</strong> all over the world probably roared with laughter at that moment. So, if you&#8217;re not one, you might be wondering why. Well, once upon a time, during Colin Baker&#8217;s run as the Sixth Doctor, there was a season-long arc called &#8220;The Trial of a Time Lord.&#8221; Most classic <b>Who</b> fans don&#8217;t like to talk about it, and for good reason. It&#8217;s pretty dreadful. Essentially, the Doctor is put on trial by the Time Lords (again!) for all his meddling. Prosecuting the Doctor is a shady character called the Valeyard, played by the very creepy Michael Jayston in an all-black Time Lord outfit that practically screams &#8220;Villain!&#8221; And indeed, he is the villain of the story. What&#8217;s more, his true identity is revealed by the Master as&#8230;get ready for this&#8230;no, really&#8230;oh, crap, here, just have the actual dialogue: &#8220;There is some evil in all of us, Doctor, even you. The Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of your nature, somewhere between your twelfth and final incarnation.&#8221; That&#8217;s right, the Valeyard plans to have the Doctor (himself) executed so he can steal his (own) remaining regenerations, because apparently you can do that. Ultimately, the Valeyard is one of the worst creations of one of the worst eras of classic <strong>Doctor Who</strong>, and fans everywhere would rather forget all about it. Thanks for reminding us, Steven Moffat. Just for that, you&#8217;re sentenced to a glassful Mel&#8217;s carrot juice! (Don&#8217;t ask.)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/20/doctor-who-the-name-of-the-doctor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End of an Era</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/17/the-end-of-an-era-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/17/the-end-of-an-era-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I used to love NBC&#8217;s <strong>The Office</strong>. I watched it religiously for many years. For a long time, I considered it the best sitcom on TV. After three or four seasons, I became convinced the American version had actually &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to love NBC&#8217;s <strong>The Office</strong>. I watched it religiously for many years. For a long time, I considered it the best sitcom on TV. After three or four seasons, I became convinced the American version had actually surpassed the British sitcom on which it was based. Dwight and Creed in particular were amazing characters, and of course, like everyone, I was caught up in the Jim and Pam romance. (Though, for a while, I was pretty sure Jim would be better off with Karen Filipelli, the Utica branch co-worker played by the outstanding Rashida Jones, who treated Jim a lot better than Pam did at the time because she actually liked him and wasn&#8217;t dithering about some completely unworthy fiancé.)</p>
<p>Strangely enough, I never considered Steve Carell&#8217;s Michael Scott my favorite character, but when Carell left the show, wisely sensing it was running out of steam after seven years, I quickly lost interest. I think I made it through roughly half the eighth season before opting out. Robert California, the replacement Regional Manager, was a disaster, despite being played by the superb James Spader. His character stuck out like a sore thumb. He belonged on a completely different show. Every plotline that focused on him was tedious. On top of that, I just couldn&#8217;t get into all the Andy and Erin romantic angst. They were no Jim and Pam. Not even close.</p>
<p>So I stayed away from the show for a year and a half, but I decided to tune in to this week&#8217;s series finale, and I&#8217;m glad I did. I laughed a lot, and even got a little teary-eyed, just like I used to during the show&#8217;s heyday. (Though Ryan abandoning his baby was pretty questionable as far as funniness goes. I mean, come on, you guys.) Still, it was a great sendoff to a once-great sitcom. So long, <strong>The Office</strong>, and thanks for all the great memories. I forgive you for Robert California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/17/the-end-of-an-era-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Year of the Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/15/the-year-of-the-storm-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/15/the-year-of-the-storm-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1361147636l/15985356.jpg" width="256" height="400" /></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t review books on this blog anymore. It got too time-consuming, so now I do it over on my <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1137883.Nicholas_Kaufmann" target="_blank">Goodreads</a> page instead. But I wanted to take a moment to talk to you about a book I really loved: &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1361147636l/15985356.jpg" width="256" height="400" /></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t review books on this blog anymore. It got too time-consuming, so now I do it over on my <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1137883.Nicholas_Kaufmann" target="_blank">Goodreads</a> page instead. But I wanted to take a moment to talk to you about a book I really loved: John Mantooth&#8217;s <strong>The Year of the Storm</strong>. I thought this story of a 14-year-old boy convinced his mother and autistic sister, both of whom went missing during a huge Alabama storm, are still alive in another world that exists beside our own was so amazing I wanted to share my Goodreads review with you here, too:</p>
<p><em>Mantooth&#8217;s debut novel shows a sure and steady hand in creating a fully believable, literary coming-of-age story peppered with hints of the supernatural. He writes compelling characters with authentic motivations and emotions, all in an evocative, confident voice. Don&#8217;t miss this one. It&#8217;s a strong contender for best novel of the year.</em> (5 out of 5 stars.)</p>
<p>I read it as an ARC. It&#8217;s coming out from Berkley in trade paperback in June. Check out the last two sentences of my review again, and then <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0425265749/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0425265749&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=kaufmann-20" target="_blank">order a copy for yourself</a>. You&#8217;ll be glad you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/15/the-year-of-the-storm-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Season 4 Is Almost Here</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/13/season-4-is-almost-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/13/season-4-is-almost-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God, yes! I cannot wait!</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/C5ddjzGft0k?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my God, yes! I cannot wait!</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/C5ddjzGft0k?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/13/season-4-is-almost-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who: &#8220;Nightmare in Silver&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/12/doctor-who-nightmare-in-silver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/12/doctor-who-nightmare-in-silver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought Neil Gaiman&#8217;s previous episode, &#8220;The Doctor&#8217;s Wife,&#8221; was pretty much the highlight of last season. Which is why, I suppose, &#8220;Nightmare in Silver&#8221; felt like such an enormous letdown. It wasn&#8217;t just bad, it was terrible, <em>and</em> it &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Neil Gaiman&#8217;s previous episode, &#8220;The Doctor&#8217;s Wife,&#8221; was pretty much the highlight of last season. Which is why, I suppose, &#8220;Nightmare in Silver&#8221; felt like such an enormous letdown. It wasn&#8217;t just bad, it was terrible, <em>and</em> it was written by Neil Gaiman, which adds an extra layer of disappointment. Cybermen! The distant future! Warwick Davis in a major supporting role! Neil Gaiman scripting! It should have been magnificent. Instead, it was a litany of squandered opportunities and lazy storytelling that with every instance only made me grow angrier. By the end, I was ready to swear off <strong>Doctor Who</strong> for good. Because if there&#8217;s one thing in the world that turns me into a ridiculous fanboy drama queen these days, it&#8217;s how far <strong>Doctor Who</strong> has fallen in the past three years.</p>
<p><strong>Spoilers follow! Be warned!</strong></p>
<p>What do I mean by squandered opportunities and lazy storytelling? Well, for starters, suddenly Clara&#8217;s charges Angie and Artie are traveling in the TARDIS, too. When did that happen? How did Clara bring it up to the Doctor? What was the initial meeting between the Doctor and the children like? We&#8217;ll never know because it&#8217;s never shown to us. Instead, they&#8217;re just there, and as a result some scenes with truly amazing potential are simply skipped over. Instead, we get the children acting like spoiled brats (What? You&#8217;ve been to space before?) and then being almost immediately kidnapped. Once the Cyberiad (what?) has them and begins to upgrade them into Cybermen, it tells the Doctor that it needed children to revive the Cybermen, for reasons never actually explained, and the Doctor has brought it children, thereby unwittingly becoming the savior of the Cybermen. Oh no! Except after it claims the children are vitally important, <em>the children do nothing at all.</em> They spend the rest of the time standing around in cyber-comas while the Doctor plays chess with himself. Because nothing is more exciting than watching someone talk to himself while playing chess!</p>
<p>Of course, the whole chess match with the cosmos at stake thing was already done, and done better, in the 1989 Sylvester McCoy 7th Doctor serial &#8220;The Curse of Fenric.&#8221; Speaking of, &#8220;Nightmare in Silver&#8221; has a weird atmosphere and tone problem that reminded me a lot of the worst of the Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy years, where everything was either literally or tonally about juvenilia and carnivals gone bad. Here, it&#8217;s a far future amusement park, where our heroes decide to hide from the Cybermen in something called Natty Longshoe&#8217;s Comical Castle. &#8220;Does it have a moat and drawbridge?&#8221; Clara asks, wondering if it&#8217;s a defensible spot. &#8220;Yes,&#8221; comes the reply, &#8220;but&#8230;comical.&#8221; And when we get to the castle? There&#8217;s nothing comical about it. Like, <em>nothing</em>. It&#8217;s just a castle. &#8220;Squandered opportunity&#8221; doesn&#8217;t even begin to describe this.</p>
<p>As for lazy storytelling, how about &#8220;We&#8217;re all going to die and there&#8217;s nothing we can do about it&#8221; being answered with &#8220;But wait, I&#8217;m secretly the Emperor of the Universe and even though this plot twist was not earned in any way by anything that came before it, I can get us all off the planet before it explodes!&#8221; Yes, you read that right. Someone is <em>secretly the Emperor of the Universe</em> and will use that to save everyone at the last minute. No, really. Here&#8217;s another example: The same person explains his situation with, essentially, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t want to be Emperor anymore because it&#8217;s so lonely, so I ran away so I could <em>hide inside a box where no one will ever see me and operate a fake Cyberman chess game.</em>&#8221; Or how about there not being a smidge of romantic chemistry between Clara and Porridge, what with them having maybe four scenes together, but he asks her to marry him anyway, because Steven Moffat? Or how about the Doctor fixating for a moment on how tight Clara&#8217;s skirt is, which is not just lazy storytelling but <em>bad</em> storytelling, since there is not a smidge of romantic chemistry between them, either, no matter how much this show likes to try to force romantic chemistry between the Doctor and his companion. Give it a rest already, people! There&#8217;s nothing there!</p>
<p>Once again it&#8217;s mentioned that the Doctor has been erasing himself from historical records, and once again it makes zero sense. One might assume the Cyberiad (or the Daleks, or any race, really) has its own memory banks and record books, rather than everyone jacking into the same cloud storage or whatever. So how did the Doctor get into the Cybermen&#8217;s memory banks and change it? When did he do that? Did he have to fight or trick his way in? What else did he find in there? Wouldn&#8217;t that have been a much more interesting story? You don&#8217;t have to answer that last one.</p>
<p>I could go on, but why bother? The episode is crap and I&#8217;d rather forget it. Like the worst of the Moffat years, it doesn&#8217;t even feel like <strong>Doctor Who</strong>. It feels like some weird, cheap, tonally deaf mix of <strong>Doctor Who</strong> and bad SyFy Original Movies. There&#8217;s only one episode left this season, plus the 50th Anniversary special in November. If those aren&#8217;t any better, I might just finally give up on <strong>Doctor Who</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/12/doctor-who-nightmare-in-silver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ray Harryhausen, R.I.P.</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/08/ray-harryhausen-r-i-p/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/08/ray-harryhausen-r-i-p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 02:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Ray-Harryhausen.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1324" alt="Ray-Harryhausen" src="http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Ray-Harryhausen.jpg" width="630" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>The great Ray Harryhausen <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-ray-harryhausen-20130508,0,7687365.story" target="_blank">passed away Tuesday</a>. He was 92.</p>
<p>I have a lifetime&#8217;s worth of fond memories of his work in stop-motion animation: <strong>Jason and the Argonauts</strong>, the <strong>Sinbad</strong> trilogy, <strong>Clash of the Titans</strong>, <strong>Mysterious Island</strong>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Ray-Harryhausen.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1324" alt="Ray-Harryhausen" src="http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Ray-Harryhausen.jpg" width="630" height="394" /></a></p>
<p>The great Ray Harryhausen <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-ray-harryhausen-20130508,0,7687365.story" target="_blank">passed away Tuesday</a>. He was 92.</p>
<p>I have a lifetime&#8217;s worth of fond memories of his work in stop-motion animation: <strong>Jason and the Argonauts</strong>, the <strong>Sinbad</strong> trilogy, <strong>Clash of the Titans</strong>, <strong>Mysterious Island</strong>, and so many more. He meant the world to me before I even knew his name. I have a feeling it was that way for lots of Monster Kids, who only learned who Harryhausen was years &#8212; maybe even decades &#8212; after his films had already burned themselves indelibly into their minds.</p>
<p>I loved the sense of awe and wonder that emanated from his best work: Talos the living statue from <strong>Jason and the Argonauts</strong>, the cyclops vs. dragon fight in <strong>The 7th Voyage of Sinbad</strong>, the Ymir in <strong>20 Million Miles to Earth</strong>, Medusa in <strong>Clash of the Titans</strong>, Joe in <strong>Mighty Joe Young</strong>, the enormous cephalopod in <strong>Mysterious Island</strong>, the centaur vs. griffin fight in <strong>The Golden Voyage of Sinbad</strong>. God, I could keep listing things until dawn. Everything he created was magic.</p>
<p>The Sinbad movies were my favorite of his oeuvre. (One of my earliest moviegoing memories is of seeing <strong>7th Voyage</strong> during an early-1970s re-release at a New York City movie theater with my grandmother and brother. I cried when it was time to leave, because I didn&#8217;t want the experience to end.) The Sinbad movies launched a thousand daydreams of my own adventures with magic and monsters, and set me on the path to becoming the writer I am today &#8212; a job where I&#8217;m allowed to continue those same daydreams. So thank you, Ray Harryhausen, for everything you gave us. They just don&#8217;t make movies like yours anymore, and I think we&#8217;re all the poorer for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/08/ray-harryhausen-r-i-p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who: &#8220;The Crimson Horror&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/07/doctor-who-the-crimson-horror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/07/doctor-who-the-crimson-horror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After last week&#8217;s frustratingly dreadful &#8220;Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS,&#8221; <strong>Doctor Who</strong> is back with a much better, much more enjoyable episode: &#8220;The Crimson Horror.&#8221; Even the title is better!</p>
<p><strong>No spoilers here, but they tend to turn </strong>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After last week&#8217;s frustratingly dreadful &#8220;Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS,&#8221; <strong>Doctor Who</strong> is back with a much better, much more enjoyable episode: &#8220;The Crimson Horror.&#8221; Even the title is better!</p>
<p><strong>No spoilers here, but they tend to turn up in comments, so consider yourself forewarned!</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The Crimson Horror&#8221; is a very entertaining episode, and it&#8217;s probably no coincidence that the Doctor doesn&#8217;t even show up until 15 minutes in. I had no idea how much I needed a break from Matt Smith! Well, yes, I did know, at least theoretically, but in practice it works very well. Instead of the usual ham-handed opener of the Doctor and Clara getting lost on the way to somewhere or other (though, rest assured, that scene is shown to us anyway in flashback because WHY), we open with a mystery in Victorian Yorkshire that draws Vastra, Jenny, and Strax to the scene. This threesome, first introduced <em>sans</em> origin story in &#8220;A Good Man Goes to War&#8221; and reappearing in the most recent Christmas special, &#8220;The Snowmen,&#8221; provide excellent comic relief (especially Strax, who keeps wanting to blow things up and often mistakenly refers to Jenny as &#8220;boy&#8221;) and nice stay-at-home companions for the Doctor. I&#8217;ve heard there is some fan demand for a spin-off series, but I suspect they work best in small doses as special guest stars. Thirteen episodes of Strax offering to blow something up would get tiresome, I think.</p>
<p>The real meat of the episode, however, comes from Diana Rigg as Winifred Gillyflower and Rigg&#8217;s real-life daughter Rachael Stirling as Winifred&#8217;s blind daughter Ada. (I&#8217;m convinced the scene where Jenny beats up the baddies while wearing a black leather catsuit is a direct homage to Rigg&#8217;s Emma Peel days.) With two such amazing actors in the cast, even a terrible script can shine. The script for &#8220;The Crimson Horror&#8221; isn&#8217;t terrible (despite being written by Mark Gatiss, who, after this and &#8220;Cold War,&#8221; seems to have taken a class on how to write better) but like so many other <strong>Doctor Who</strong> stories, especially during Steven Moffat&#8217;s tenure, it falls apart if you examine the details too closely. I promised no spoilers, but as usual it&#8217;s an overcomplicated plot on the part of the baddies that really doesn&#8217;t come to much of anything, and also as usual, sadly, Matt Smith goes for comedic mugging in spots where he should be acting with outrage or concern (such as when Ada takes her revenge on Mr. Sweet). Though his Frankenstein&#8217;s monster-like performance in his first few minutes onscreen is actually pretty funny. So is the running gag of the fainting client. (The &#8220;Thomas Thomas&#8221; joke is less so. I mean, is the TomTom GPS so culturally relevant as to warrant a nod?)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a giant missed opportunity here when Jenny and Vastra ask the Doctor how Clara can still be alive. Instead of answering in a way that would let the audience share the Doctor&#8217;s sense of irresistible mystery, he pretty much blows off the question. I found that lazy and disappointing. There&#8217;s also a coda with Artie and Angie, the children Clara takes care of, that felt forced and didn&#8217;t quite work for me. The kids accept the possibility of time travel much too readily.</p>
<p>Ultimately, &#8220;The Crimson Horror&#8221; isn&#8217;t a great episode, nor a bad one. It is funny, thrilling, and entertaining, though, and for <strong>Doctor Who</strong> in the overcomplicated, overwrought Steven Moffat era, that&#8217;s enough for me.</p>
<p>And now, some brief <strong>Doctor Who</strong> neepery: When the Doctor and Clara leave the TARDIS upon arriving in Yorkshire when he meant to go to London, he mentions he &#8220;once spent a long time trying to get a gobby Australian to Heathrow Airport.&#8221; This is a reference to Tegan Jovanka, an Australian stewardess who wandered into the TARDIS in the final Fourth Doctor serial &#8220;Logopolis&#8221; after the Master killed her aunt, helped the Doctor through his regeneration, and then accompanied the Fifth Doctor for the majority of his adventures. Tegan once described herself as &#8220;a mouth on legs,&#8221; and indeed she spent most of her time arguing with or yelling at the Doctor. (There&#8217;s a story about a young fan asking Peter Davison if the Doctor and Tegan are married because they argue so much.) Tegan was never all that well suited for adventuring &#8212; really, she just wanted to get back to Heathrow and resume her work &#8212; and whenever danger arose the Doctor would tell her, &#8220;Brave heart, Tegan.&#8221; That line is echoed in &#8220;The Crimson Horror&#8221; right after the Heathrow line with &#8220;Brave heart, Clara.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/07/doctor-who-the-crimson-horror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Shirley Jackson Award Nominees Announced</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/03/2012-shirley-jackson-award-nominees-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/03/2012-shirley-jackson-award-nominees-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 19:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The nominees for the 2012 Shirley Jackson Awards &#8212; my favorite literary award for psychological suspense, horror, and the dark fantastic &#8212; <a href="http://www.shirleyjacksonawards.org/nominees/" target="_blank">have been officially announced</a>! And they are:</p>
<p><b>NOVEL</b></p>
<ul>
<li><i>The Drowning Girl</i>, Caitlín R. Kiernan (ROC)</li>
<li><i>The </i></li>&#8230;</ul>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nominees for the 2012 Shirley Jackson Awards &#8212; my favorite literary award for psychological suspense, horror, and the dark fantastic &#8212; <a href="http://www.shirleyjacksonawards.org/nominees/" target="_blank">have been officially announced</a>! And they are:</p>
<p><b>NOVEL</b></p>
<ul>
<li><i>The Drowning Girl</i>, Caitlín R. Kiernan (ROC)</li>
<li><i>The Devil in Silver</i>, Victor LaValle (Spiegel &amp; Grau)</li>
<li><i>Edge</i>, Koji Suzuki (Vertical, Inc.)</li>
<li><i>Gone Girl</i>, Gillian Flynn (Crown Publishers)</li>
<li><i>Immobility</i>, Brian Evenson (Tor)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>NOVELLA</b></p>
<ul>
<li><i>28 Teeth of Rage</i>, Ennis Drake (Omnium Gatherum Media)</li>
<li><i>Delphine Dodd</i>, S.P. Miskowski (Omnium Gatherum Media)</li>
<li><i>I’m Not Sam</i>, Jack Ketchum and Lucky McKee (Sinister Grin Press/ Cemetery Dance Publications)</li>
<li><i>The Indifference Engine</i>, Project Itoh (Haikasoru/VIZ Media LLC)</li>
<li>“Sky,” Kaaron Warren (<em>Through Splintered Walls</em>, Twelfth Planet Press)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>NOVELETTE</b></p>
<ul>
<li>“The Crying Child,” Bruce McAllister (originally “The Bleeding Child,” <i>Cemetery Dance</i> #68)</li>
<li>“The House on Ashley Avenue,” Ian Rogers (<i>Every House is Haunted</i>, ChiZine Publications)</li>
<li>“Reeling for the Empire,” Karen Russell (<i>Tin House</i>, Winter 2012)</li>
<li>“Wild Acre,” Nathan Ballingrud (<i>Visions, Fading Fast</i>, Pendragon Press)</li>
<li>“The Wish Head,” Jeffrey Ford (<i>Crackpot Palace</i>, William Morrow)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>SHORT FICTION</b></p>
<ul>
<li>“Bajazzle,” Margo Lanagan (<i>Cracklescape</i>, Twelfth Planet Press)</li>
<li>“How We Escaped Our Certain Fate,” Dan Chaon (<i>21<sup>st</sup> Century Dead</i>, St. Martin’s)</li>
<li>“Little America,” Dan Chaon (<i>Shadow Show: All New Stories in Celebration of Ray Bradbury</i>, William Morrow)</li>
<li>“The Magician’s Apprentice,” Tamsyn Muir (<i>Weird Tales</i> #359)</li>
<li>“A Natural History of Autumn,” Jeffrey Ford (<i>Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction</i>, July/August 2012)</li>
<li>“Two Houses,” Kelly Link (<i>Shadow Show: All-New Stories in Celebration of Ray Bradbury</i>, William Morrow)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>SINGLE-AUTHOR COLLECTION</b></p>
<ul>
<li><i>Crackpot Palace</i>, Jeffrey Ford (William Morrow)</li>
<li><i>Errantry</i>, Elizabeth Hand (Small Beer Press)</li>
<li><i>The Pottawatomie Giant and Other Stories</i>, Andy Duncan (PS Publishing)</li>
<li><i>Remember Why You Fear Me</i>, Robert Shearman (ChiZine Publications)</li>
<li><i>The Woman Who Married a Cloud</i>, Jonathan Carroll (Subterranean Press)</li>
<li><i>Windeye</i>, Brian Evenson (Coffee House Press)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>EDITED ANTHOLOGY</b></p>
<ul>
<li><i>21<sup>st</sup> Century Dead</i>, edited by Christopher Golden (St. Martin’s)</li>
<li><i>Black Wings II</i>, edited by S. T. Joshi (PS Publishing)</li>
<li><i>Exotic Gothic 4:  Postscripts #28/29</i>, edited by Danel Olson (PS Publishing)</li>
<li><i>Night Shadows</i>, edited by Greg Herren and J. M.  Redmann (Bold Strokes Books)</li>
<li><i>Shadow Show: All-New Stories in Celebration of Ray Bradbury</i>, edited by Sam Weller and Mort Castle (William Morrow)</li>
</ul>
<p>Congratulations to all the nominees, but especially to my good friends Victor LaValle, Jack Ketchum, Ian Rogers, Nathan Ballingrud, Jeffrey Ford, Kelly Link, Robert Shearman, Christopher Golden, and Mort Castle. Not that I&#8217;m playing favorites!</p>
<p>The 2012 Shirley Jackson Awards will be presented on Sunday, July 14<sup>th</sup> at <a href="http://www.readercon.org" target="_blank">Readercon 24</a> in Burlington, Massachusetts and will be hosted by Guest of Honor Maureen McHugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/05/03/2012-shirley-jackson-award-nominees-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who: &#8220;Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/04/29/doctor-who-journey-to-the-centre-of-the-tardis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/04/29/doctor-who-journey-to-the-centre-of-the-tardis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t even. Just when I thought <strong>Doctor Who</strong> was starting to get good again, it airs an episode so shitty I can&#8217;t even bring myself to summarize it for you. All I have are questions, all of which are &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t even. Just when I thought <strong>Doctor Who</strong> was starting to get good again, it airs an episode so shitty I can&#8217;t even bring myself to summarize it for you. All I have are questions, all of which are ignored by the script. (I&#8217;m not even talking about all the ridiculous coincidences in the story, like the Doctor turning off the TARDIS shields for no good reason right at the moment the TARDIS is about to be grabbed by the one thing it really, really needs those shields to prevent.)</p>
<p><strong>Spoilers follow, but trust me, you don&#8217;t even want to watch this episode anyway!</strong></p>
<p>First and foremost, how the fuck does the Doctor <em>fall out of the TARDIS</em> when it&#8217;s taken on board the salvagers&#8217; ship? What exactly is the toxic substance that is making the TARDIS&#8217; interior so deadly? Isn&#8217;t it <em>the exact same substance the Doctor is able to effortlessly vent out of the console room</em> as soon as he regains access to the TARDIS? How are the time zombies (you read that right, and if you&#8217;re not rolling your eyes already something is dead inside you) &#8212; who are essentially dying, seriously injured, burned up bodies &#8212; strong enough to attack people and chase them around the TARDIS? <em>Why</em> do they attack them? (The director, Mat King, cribs a technique from Danny Boyle&#8217;s <strong>Sunshine</strong> by never showing the time zombies in focus, because he knows they look ridiculous!) If the Doctor&#8217;s name is such a well-kept and important secret, why do the authors of the book Clara finds in the TARDIS library, <strong>The History of the Time War</strong>, know it and print it with impunity? (The book could not have been written by the Time Lords themselves. They didn&#8217;t survive the Time War to write about it!) Why would the Doctor even allow that?</p>
<p>It is insufferably stupid to have the Doctor set the TARDIS self-destruct mechanism, then admit there is no self-destruct mechanism, then act like a dick about it, and then be all, &#8220;Oh shit, the TARDIS really is going to blow up!&#8221; But even stupider is Tricky not realizing he&#8217;s actually human when he thinks he&#8217;s an android. It reminded me of Crayford in the 1975 Fourth Doctor serial &#8220;The Android Invasion,&#8221; who thinks he&#8217;s been turned into an android by the Kraals who rescued him from a rocket crash, but actually there was no crash and they didn&#8217;t turn him into an android. How does he discover this? He lifts his eyepatch and discovers he still has two eyes! <em>It never occurred to him to lift his eyepatch before then!</em> It&#8217;s much the same with Tricky. Apparently, he never wonders why he, as an android, is in the family photo with his two brothers and his dad. The whole thing is just shockingly stupid in an episode that is already shockingly stupid to begin with.</p>
<p>And of course the biggest, most pervasive question of the episode is: How come when <strong>Doctor Who</strong> finally has a plurality of black characters in one episode, they essentially turn out to be thieves and chop-shoppers?</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s okay, because in the end none of it happens! That&#8217;s right, this is one of those &#8220;time travel is magic&#8221; episodes where everything gets super shitty and then the Doctor does some timey-wimey bullshit and the entire timeline is changed so that it doesn&#8217;t happen. Thank goodness there are no rules to time travel! Except the ones that are occasionally necessary for plot purposes, of course. But when the plot demands there <em>not</em> be any rules, there aren&#8217;t. NAILED IT!</p>
<p>&#8220;Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS&#8221; is an episode best forgotten in a season that so far, with a couple of exceptions, is best forgotten as well. Much like most of last season. And most of the season before.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m growing to hate the fact that Steven Moffat will be the one in charge of the 50th Anniversary special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/04/29/doctor-who-journey-to-the-centre-of-the-tardis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who: &#8220;Hide&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/04/21/doctor-who-hide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/04/21/doctor-who-hide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv nerd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/?p=1304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;Hide&#8221; can best be summed up by what my wife Alexa said after we watched it: &#8220;This is the first <strong>Doctor Who</strong> episode I&#8217;ve liked all season.&#8221; I liked it, too, and was just as surprised about that &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;Hide&#8221; can best be summed up by what my wife Alexa said after we watched it: &#8220;This is the first <strong>Doctor Who</strong> episode I&#8217;ve liked all season.&#8221; I liked it, too, and was just as surprised about that as she was. I liked it even more than &#8220;Cold War,&#8221; which is the only other episode this season that hasn&#8217;t made me want to give up on the show entirely. Of course, &#8220;Hide&#8221; is a haunted house story, so I might be biased.</p>
<p><strong>No spoilers this time, though some may appear in the comments, so proceed there with caution!</strong></p>
<p>As haunted house stories go, it&#8217;s a good one. It draws a bit too much from the well of Shirley Jackson&#8217;s <strong>The Haunting of Hill House</strong> &#8212; the loud banging noises, the &#8220;I&#8217;m not holding your hand&#8221; gag &#8212;  but the spooky atmosphere works. So do the characters of Alec Palmer, the ghost hunter masterfully played by Dougray Scott with understatement and humility, and empathic psychic Emma Grayling (Jessica Raine, keeping up with Dougray Scott quite well). Of course, this being <strong>Doctor Who</strong>, we know from the start it won&#8217;t really be a ghost. While the supernatural does exist in <strong>Doctor Who</strong>, there always turns out to be a scientific explanation, usually aliens or alien technology. That&#8217;s not quite the case here, but I&#8217;ve promised no spoilers because this one actually has quite a good solution to its central mystery. A rarity for <strong>Doctor Who</strong> these days.</p>
<p>I also quite liked how they keep the mystery of Clara going, without it being ham-handed like the crack that showed up at the end of every episode in Season 5, or the eyepatch woman showing up randomly in Season 6. I&#8217;m interested in finding out what the deal is with Clara, but also dreading the inevitable Moffatisms that will no doubt come into play upon the mystery&#8217;s solving. I still think Matt Smith is mugging too much for the camera, though, playing the fool in situations where he should be graver. But I have a strained relationship with the Eleventh Doctor. Sometimes I warm to him, and other times I just roll my eyes.</p>
<p>And now, some good old-fashioned <strong>Doctor Who</strong> neepery!</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first haunted house the Doctor has explored. In the absolutely dreadful 1965 serial &#8220;The Chase,&#8221; William Hartnell&#8217;s First Doctor &#8212; along with Ian, Barbara, and Susan replacement Vicki &#8212; go on the run from the Daleks&#8217; newly invented time machine and wind up in a variety of locales. One of them is a haunted house occupied by &#8212; I shit you not &#8212; Dracula and Frankenstein&#8217;s monster. Of course, it turns out they&#8217;re merely animatronic robots in a future Earth haunted attraction, but the whole episode is a low point for <strong>Doctor Who</strong>, even among those first few choppy years.</p>
<p>Much better is the 1989 serial &#8220;Ghost Light,&#8221; in which Sylvester McCoy&#8217;s Eighth Doctor and his companion Ace wind up in a haunted house in London in 1883. I&#8217;m not a fan of that many of the Eighth Doctor serials. They tend to be overcomplicated to the point of incomprehensibility, and &#8220;Ghost Light&#8221; is perhaps the prime example of this. Still, it&#8217;s an enjoyable adventure featuring a crashed space ship under a manor house that&#8217;s causing all manner of fuss.</p>
<p>There is a reference in &#8220;Hide&#8221; to a blue crystal from Metebelis 3. This, too, has been mentioned before. Jon Pertwee&#8217;s Third Doctor would talk about Metebelis 3 all the time, and in the 1973 serial &#8220;The Green Death,&#8221; he uses a blue crystal from Metebelis 3 as a telepathic tool to defeat the baddies. Then he gives the crystal to his companion Jo Grant as a wedding present. The following season, in 1974&#8242;s &#8220;Planet of the Spiders,&#8221; the Doctor realizes the blue crystal he took from Metebelis 3 is super important to the giant spiders who rule that planet. The spiders decide to invade Earth to get it back. The Doctor eventually goes to Metebelis 3 to defeat the Great One, the leader of the giant spiders, but in doing so his body gets poisoned with radiation. He returns to Earth, to UNIT headquarters. There, in front of Sarah Jane Smith and the Brigadier, and with the help of K&#8217;anpo Rimpoche, a Time Lord hiding on Earth as a Buddhist abbot (!), he regenerates into Tom Baker&#8217;s Fourth Doctor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nicholaskaufmann.com/2013/04/21/doctor-who-hide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
